OnlyFans Cuts Ties with Bonnie Blue Over Controversial 2,000-Person Stunt
Adult content creator Bonnie Blue, real name Tia Billinger, has been permanently banned from OnlyFans following massive backlash over her planned “Petting Zoo” stunt — a provocative and extreme event that sparked public outrage and violated the platform’s terms of service.
The 26-year-old British model, infamous for her high-risk sexual “challenges,” teased the event in late May 2025. The “Bonnie Blue’s Petting Zoo” exhibition, originally scheduled for June 15 in central London, was billed as a 24-hour “no limits, no breaks” adult performance.
Trending Now!!:
Promotional materials claimed that Blue would be gagged, bound, and fully nude inside a transparent box, available for up to 2,000 participants to “do whatever they want” to her. The event website — now offline — described it as “dirty, intense, and completely open,” with options for voyeurism, live group sex, and audience participation.
Blue hoped to break her own record, having previously claimed to sleep with 1,057 men in 12 hours during a January stunt. On The Kat Baker Show podcast, she defended the event, noting it would occur in a private residence and that attendees were required to sign consent forms. She also said other women would take part. Still, the concept faced heavy criticism for glamorizing rape culture and posing serious risks to safety, consent, and public health.
The reaction was immediate and fierce. Social media platforms erupted with outrage. Users branded the event “disgusting,” “exploitation,” and “dehumanizing.” One viral post called it “a danger to society.” Others questioned the legality of the event, warning, “She WILL get hurt.”
By June 2, Blue’s main Instagram account (796,000 followers) and TikTok (165,000 followers) were removed due to her promotional content.
Rape survivors and advocacy organizations were especially vocal. In an interview with OK Magazine, one survivor called Blue’s stunt “a slap in the face to millions,” arguing it normalized violence against women and retraumatized victims. Critics also pointed to the broader impact of such stunts on a society already grappling with rising sexual assault statistics and online toxicity.
Other OnlyFans creators were quick to distance themselves. Fellow content creator Sophie Rain publicly condemned Blue, saying, “This isn’t empowerment anymore — it’s a circus.” In an interview with The Blast, Rain added, “She’s making a joke out of all of us. Brands don’t take us seriously. The media laughs at us now.”
On June 10, OnlyFans issued a formal statement confirming Blue’s permanent ban:
“Extreme challenge content is not permitted under our Acceptable Use Policy. Violations result in content or account removal.”
A source told The Sun: “Bonnie pushed the boundaries too far. She was earning hundreds of thousands a month, and it’s all gone. OnlyFans had no choice.”
Estimates suggest Blue was making up to £600,000 ($800,000) per month, making the ban a massive financial hit.
This wasn’t her first controversial act. Blue previously faked a pregnancy, staged a fake arrest for views, and offered to pay university tuition for a student who won a sexual challenge. However, the “Petting Zoo” was seen as a step too far — both ethically and legally.
On June 9, she announced the cancellation of the event in a now-deleted TikTok video. She didn’t give a reason but teased an alternative: “The petting zoo has had to go, but I’m replacing it with something even better. On June 14, I’m doing the largest livestream ever.” Details remain vague.
While some influencers praised the cancellation as a savvy PR stunt, others called it a last-ditch effort to stay relevant. One TikToker dubbed the entire saga a “marketing scam,” theorizing that the event was never meant to happen.
Since joining OnlyFans in 2021, Blue built her brand on shock value — from sneaking into stadiums for viral content to pushing sexual limits under the guise of empowerment. She’s now the subject of an upcoming Channel 4 documentary titled The Bonnie Blue Story, which will explore her career, controversies, and motivations.
Critics argue her actions spotlight a darker side of the digital attention economy — where creators escalate outrageous behaviour for views, money, and relevance. The Standard compared her stunts to performance art, even likening them to David Blaine’s infamous Perspex box, but emphasized that her work reflects deeper issues: economic desperation, platform exploitation, and a culture obsessed with viral fame.
Ethical concerns continue to swirl. Health experts warn of the physical dangers of extreme sexual challenges, while cybersecurity researchers say scammers have used her name and likeness to spread malware via fake content links. Questions about the consent process — especially for younger participants — have also alarmed professionals.
The “Petting Zoo” controversy has reignited conversations around adult content, consent, and the role platforms like OnlyFans play in regulating creator behaviour. Some view Blue as a provocateur with sexual agency; others see her as a symptom of a broken system that profits from pushing the limits of decency and safety.
For creators like Sophie Rain, the damage is personal and professional:
“We’ve worked hard to build credibility. And now we’re back to square one because of her antics.”
OnlyFans, reportedly valued at over £8 billion, has long faced a balancing act between creator freedom and public responsibility — a tension that exploded in 2021 when it briefly tried to ban adult content before backtracking due to backlash.
Now, with Blue’s ban and public fallout, the platform is signalling a firmer stance. Whether it will enforce those boundaries consistently remains to be seen.
As for Bonnie Blue, her future is uncertain. With her main income stream cut off and her social media presence wiped out, she may be forced to reinvent herself yet again. Her planned June 14 livestream could be a pivot — or her last stand in a collapsing digital empire.
While Bonnie Blue clearly crossed a line, it raises bigger questions about how platforms define ‘acceptable’ when they’ve built their brands on risqué content to begin with. It feels like a tipping point in how adult content platforms balance creator freedom with public perception.